Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Jobs with the Apple iPad.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
derivative works violation, image conatins copyrighted software elements which the author does not have permission to post Terrillja (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC) In addition, the photographer was working at the time on assignment for gizmodo, who would own the rights to the images per US copyright law.--Terrillja (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep de minimis -Nard the Bard 22:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - clear copyright violation of both Apple (whose non-free software is pictured) and Gizmodo, who took the picture and have released the picture under a non-commercial license incompatible with Commons Little Professor (talk) 02:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, in fact the license is perfectly acceptable to Commons. -Nard the Bard 02:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - The nominator clearly has not read Commons:de minimis! -- Petri Krohn (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Agree, COM:DM. --NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click here to talk to me) 23:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Even if you argue de minimis with regard to Apple's copyright, there's no arguing that Gizmodo's copyright has been clearly violated. Contrary to what Nard the Bard states, the CC-BY-NC "no commercial use" license used by Gizmodo is not acceptable on Commons - see Commons:Licensing for confirmation Little Professor (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, the image is licensed under a CC-BY-2.0 license, which is suitable for Commons. As stated on other iPad deletion debates, you don't know what financial arrangements Gizmodo has with the photographer. Some of these iPad deletion debates have already been closed as Keep because of this. -NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits) 23:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, the image is licensed under a CC-BY-2.0 license, which is suitable for Commons. As stated on other iPad deletion debates, you don't know what financial arrangements Gizmodo has with the photographer. Some of these iPad deletion debates have already been closed as
- Even if you argue de minimis with regard to Apple's copyright, there's no arguing that Gizmodo's copyright has been clearly violated. Contrary to what Nard the Bard states, the CC-BY-NC "no commercial use" license used by Gizmodo is not acceptable on Commons - see Commons:Licensing for confirmation Little Professor (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept. De minimis --Justass (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
