Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stable Diffusion AI-generated painting of nude woman.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is the user's own work and used for harassment but I deleted this file with F10 criteria because I do not think that this file is in scope. By the reason of User:Dronebogus's request in my talk page, I undeleted it and nominated for deletion. Kadı Message 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uncommon subject— how many pictures of AI generated nude women do we have, let alone ones that actually look this good? Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (on behalf of uploader Benlisquare, who is blocked – see their reply to the DR notification on their talk page) Brianjd (talk) 14:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus and Kadı: The AI prompt includes names (of artists?). See Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare for scope and copyright concerns. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per Dronebogus, it sounds like there's a lot more that'll need deletion review. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Um, I voted keep? And my argument was that it was in scope because it was not a common subject, so why are you seemingly suggesting I said it was common? Dronebogus (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti I agree that your comment makes no sense. Brianjd (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont remove, i liked it ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 04:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: same as Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Run-of-the-mill AI image. No realistic educational purpose, fails COM:SCOPE. This image seems to have been deleted and undeleted twice before, first because of a request for a full deletion discussion and second due to premature closure of the deletion discussion. Please let this discussion run its proper course. Nosferattus (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Porn without any educational value as far as I can see. Don't know why it's still there when the outcome above seems to be delete. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GPSLeo: Rhododendrites talk13:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]