Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spread vagina.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spread vagina.jpg

Per Google image seems to have been on another website (porn) since October 13, 2012. Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Delete - eugh, google URLs... The image on that page appears to be smaller, but seems instructive. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep - This image is a photo of my girlfriend and I am the original photo taker of it. I don't know why anyone thinks it is this German websites photo! Please let me know what to do to sort this out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff2580 (talk • contribs) 10:47, 15 November 2012‎ (UTC)

   Comment - copied from talk page. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Delete all this user's uploads. One has already gone, looking very much like a video capture. This looks suspicious. But look at the amateurish File:Female masturbation.jpg and the beautiful professional File:Breasts & nipples.jpg:- I don't think they're the same photographer and from those aureolae I know they're not the same woman. Two helpful girlfriends Jeff? The latter photo was taken (according to the camera location) in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, while File:Condom on penis.JPG was taken in a remote bit of forest near the US/Canadian border. This last image is the only one with EXIF data. Perhaps Jeff2580 can explain this situation? --Simonxag (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. Handcuffed (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment - I saw the earlier uploads of this user and there didn't seem to to be any reason to question their source (they were deleted as "Superfluous sexually explicit material"). The Google link doesn't work for me. Can someone post a direct link to the site, please? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
• You were correct. I uploaded it first and it was deleted. During that time someone must have copied it and copyrighted it as their own (I assume). As for the different geographic locations. I tried to change some of the locations because it exposed where I live. If you look they are pretty much taken all from the same device. So that't not fair that my photos were taken from me and claimed as someone elses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff2580 (talk • contribs) 10:47, 27 November 2012‎ (UTC)

   Comment - copied from talk page. --Simonxag (talk) 20:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Delete Hey, that is my girlfriend's vagina, a blatant copyvio! --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

I take it that this is a joke, right? --Simonxag (talk) 21:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Delete Gross. It is a copyright violation and is not appropriate for a website of this type anyways. TBrandley 19:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

We do not delete images because some people find them offensive and photographs of genitals (and other body parts) are very much appropriate for an educational resource site. I doubt the copyright of these images, if you have any more relevant evidence please provide it. --Simonxag (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Keep The Google search clearly stats that the picture were first uploaded to commons on 10. Sept. 2012, the ” poppyspicturesmatureglamour” site uploaded it on 13. Okt. 2012, so it would seem that Jeff2580 actually is right, or at least it seems possible --Gddea - Daniel E. Als-Juliussen (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Delete, and take a closer look at the user's other contributions. --Conti|✉ 02:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  All the rest, apart from File:Female masturbation.jpg (didn't we delete that previously?) were taken with an iPhone 4 - I'm willing to accept them as own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  Hm, yes that was deleted previously, speedily as "superfluous sexually explicit material" by Siebrand. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

But please note Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fingering pussy.jpg. That was deleted as a probable copyright violation. --Simonxag (talk) 10:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

• What are Common's rules regarding users who knowingly upload copyright violations? I mean, assuming that the other pictures of the user are in fact his own (though I'm not sure we can really make sure that they are), surely there has to be something done to make sure that this user doesn't upload copyright violations again? It seems odd to me that someone who uploaded copyright violations in the past continues to be allowed to upload pictures. --Conti|✉ 11:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  User has had 2, maybe 3 copyvio uploads. Most DRs of user's images were as bad quality or out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  Aren't 3 copyvios a whole lot? If someone would have written 3 copyvio articles on en.wp, he'd most likely be blocked until he promised not to do it again, which seems very reasonable. --Conti|✉ 12:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  Commons works differently from en.wp. User has been blocked once already, we tend to allow them rope to hang themselves, and if copyvios were uploaded pre-block, it doesn't make sense to block them again. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  I'm honestly not sure how that makes any sense. We should, at the very least, require the user to show some proof that all these pictures are his, and prevent him from uploading more until he shows such proof. --Conti|✉ 13:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 22:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)