Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spravedlivaya.svg
Logo of the political party, license is possibly incorrect, such logos usually are copyrighted. --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 19:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- comment Without discussing this specific file - would a DIY visualisation of their blazon text [1] be as well "copyrighted" (by whom?) or not? Incidentally, the blazon leaves the impression of being too simple to be protected (three colour band of X colours and Y height, yellow lettering - they didn't even specify a font). NVO (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- PS. As I understand present-day legislation, the blazon never needed a "copyrighting" act - as part of the party's charter, it was registered by the Ministry of Justice (grin), last time in August 2009. NVO (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment Our rule is that a particular instance of heraldry is copyrighted by its creator, so that we cannot simply grab such things off the web. As NVO suggests, however, if one of our users creates a new version of the logo from the blazon, it would be free. Also, if the source of this, http://www.logofree.ru, is actually appropriately licensed (sorry, I can't read it), then this is a keep. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep Either drawn correct or incorrectly it`s not up to us to delete russian artwork. It`s not up to wikipedy species to express personal opinions such as "logos usually are copyrighted"Special+Utilizator+$ (talk) 05:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-simple Jcb (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
