Commons:Deletion requests/File:Speculative flag of Arewa Republic.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


User:Kephir has been taken to the "User problems" noticeboard on two separate occasions over "Special and fictional flags" deletion nomination requests and his revenge deletion nomination requests against people who opposed them (once, twice), and has received a conspicuous lack of support for certain problematic aspects of his way of operating. At an absolute minimum, I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals using the same problematic cut-and-pasted boilerplate one-size-fits-all cookie-cutter text be automatically rejected until Kephir has modified his behavior so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 17:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think it shows any degree of "good faith" on the part of User:Kephir to return to doing exactly what there were many previous objections to his doing, as soon as his one-week ban has expired. In fact (as with a number of aspects of the later phases of Kephir's career on Commons), it's very easy to deduce that there's a certain spiteful and malicious component to Kephir cutting-and-pasting in yet again one more time the exact same one-size-fits-all boilerplate cookie-cutter text which has been a point of controversy. Again, I strongly recommend that all of Kephir's "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals using the same problematic cut-and-pasted text be automatically rejected until and unless Kephir makes some tangible effort to show that he can change his patterns of behavior in order to work well with others (and not just ignoring all comments and concerns so that he continues with exactly the same ways of working that he started with, which have caused friction). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused fictional flag Denniss (talk) 07:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]