Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smbaliuagjf243.JPG
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. 2008 building according to en:SM City Baliwag. Stefan4 (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I was wrong in undeleting this image of a mall near our town, which was opened around 2008. SM malls, despite "boxy shoebox type style stereotypes", are considered works of architecture - pls. see this Philippine Star article. No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Can be undeleted once full FOP is introduced here in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep I see only an insignificant wall. Any normal human eye will see this as a picture of parked cars, IMHO. Therefore the backside wall is not even DM, it has no significance neither as an architectural design nor as an important visual element. --E4024 (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Architecture is considered as a form of fine arts in the Philippines, and a substantial part of the mall seems to have been intentionally included in the image. Also the image was used in an article relating to malls before, which means that the mall building is the central essence of the image. See also the input of my new nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smmarilaojf.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On Category:SM City Baliwag a warning is present that the images might be copyrighted. This image is an example, although there are several more. Perhaps @JWilz12345: would like to check them. This image clearly shows the architectural element. If it would be cropped, only an image of parking lot would remain, a barely relevant image. Therefore this image is deleted. -- Elly (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
