Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheikh Nemer Baqir Al-Nemer by Talkhandak.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At this blog there is this photograph nimr-baqir-al-nimr.jpg which resembles File:Sheikh Nemer Baqir Al-Nemer by Talkhandak.jpg very closely. Flip nimr-baqir-al-nimr.jpg left-to-right, scale it up by a factor of 1.15 (i.e. to 690x420), look at it as a transparent layer on top of Sheikh Nemer Baqir Al-Nemer by Talkhandak.jpg, and I think that the evidence of Sheikh Nemer Baqir Al-Nemer by Talkhandak.jpg being a derivative work of nimr-baqir-al-nimr.jpg, apparently (c) w:Press TV, is very strong. The artist making the derived version changed very little apart from the style, but cropped the turban a little. ... Feel free to copy/paste this paragraph to a another page where it's appropriate. (signed) Boud Additional note: this image was license reviewed but reviewer apparently didn't find the original photograph. Besides the turban being a little smaller, notice that the curled blue book appears in both images, and also the inner cuff of his right sleeve. The similarities between the two images are compelling. This image is a Derivative Work of a Press TV image from here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is actually Makruh, not Mustahabb, to hold religious text with left for some muslims. But this culture also depends. Sunni Arabs care but Shia people, of at least Shia people of Iran, don't care about this, and believe there is no difference between hands in daily tasks.Monfie (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work, not original enough. Simply mirrored and used as a template. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]