Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schlafzimmer 1 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It contains several elements that could be usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:PERSONAL Markus13666 (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous deletion request.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)- What elements are unique and useful for the project for educational purposes? 88.67.61.156 07:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The mat is probably unique, but that's an irrelevant question. Elements don't have to be unique to be usable, and the burden is on the nominator to demonstrate that it couldn't possibly have a use. It was already kept, and the nominator was trying to get out of their irrevocable agreement to give their photos a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a random private photo without focusing on anything. «Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.» Commons:Project scope#Examples Markus13666 (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- And you'll make the same claim next year after this is kept again. No-one forced you to upload it, and if you think there are no usable elements in this photo, that's fine, I guess, but doesn't determine how others might use it. And I won't engage further in this IMO useless discussion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- The mat is probably unique, but that's an irrelevant question. Elements don't have to be unique to be usable, and the burden is on the nominator to demonstrate that it couldn't possibly have a use. It was already kept, and the nominator was trying to get out of their irrevocable agreement to give their photos a Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Source https://www.instagram.com/novndrr/ Viii23dawari (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Viii23dawari, can you give a direct link to the photo? I'm not seeing it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.instagram.com/s/aGlnaGxpZ2h0OjE4MjA4MTg1NjgyMjc4MTU3?story_media_id=2988775161683673476&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Viii23dawari (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- I guess there's no way to view the image without logging into instagram? OK, then someone else will look at it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.instagram.com/s/aGlnaGxpZ2h0OjE4MjA4MTg1NjgyMjc4MTU3?story_media_id=2988775161683673476&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Viii23dawari (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Viii23dawari, can you give a direct link to the photo? I'm not seeing it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The Instagram user appears to have deleted all their photos, but I'll trust that it was there and that it was posted before its upload to Commons. —holly {chat} 19:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)