Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scarecrow - GBA Viote 49.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
MPF (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep A scarecrow is not a architectural or artistic work protected under copyright law. --Jaqen (talk) 04:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Seems like this is artistic work (modern sculpture). Taivo (talk) 07:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's not an artistic sculpture: it's a scarecrow in a field. --Jaqen (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with user Jaqen. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's not an artistic sculpture: it's a scarecrow in a field. --Jaqen (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, not at all an artwork, and it doesn't belong to architecture (which is what the Italian NO-FOP and copyright law are about). It's a simple object, nothing more than that, and the fact that it is exposed to the public vision has nothing to do with a potentially expected enjoyment of art: its sole and sufficient function is to be seen, just like traffic lights, but notably a scarecrow is there to be seen by birds and hopefully frighten them no matter their artistic proficiency. It is indeed as much creative as a homemade cake can be: they are both made with care and shaped with emotion, they are usually garnished and often smell a little, but that's all: they are only handmade objects, not even the product of some craftsmanship. Free for us, legitimate picture. --g (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Jaqen. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
