Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scanner ass - Flickr - stnu.jpg
Ass on a scanner. That's new. Half a bonus point for useless creativity. Still, I would argue this is not reasonably useful for educational purposes. Actually, it's really not useful for much of anything other than giving the scanee something idiotic to do for 6 seconds and giving Commons editors yet another asinine (a pun!) file to delete. – JBarta (talk) 04:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep This is an illustration of a cultural phenomenon, and it shows the texture of the scrotum quite well. Handcuffed (talk) 04:35, 9 May 2012 (UTC)- Keep, unique usage of light and shadow in depiction of popular cultural phenomenon. -- Cirt (talk) 22:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per handcuffed and cirt russavia (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Questionable whether this has any educational content, especially given low quality Ubcule (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Given that this has already been nominated and kept (as per above), I'd like to withdraw this request. (I still think it's pretty worthless personally, though). Ubcule (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Reclose as kept; nom withdrawn by nominator. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Seemingly out of scope. Unused image with no demonstrable encyclopedic or educational value. Night Ranger (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, as per past discussions. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous 2 DR. This is a popular activity, so much that is parodied in several shows like the US Simpsons, so this image is in scope. Tm (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Wow, a scanned ass... A piece of art indeed, although a bit dark in my opinion, but then again it can be art with lights and contrast. Also it can depict the social-economic status that people are currently living (no money for a camera or a higher resolution scanner?). --Btmpnr01 (talk) 22:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - this is in scope because it demonstrates that the scanner can capture even the bizarrest of "material". Green Giant (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept per the above. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Unused, Seemingly out of focus. Questionable EV Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Non-admin closure, Apparently technical quality and questionable EV are not "policy" reasons for deletion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
