Commons:Deletion requests/File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int05.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Is it FOP inside a church in Sweden? I trided asking here with no response so now i try this. Hangsna (talk) 15:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- The same conditions should apply for this file: File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int06.jpg. Ulkl (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Actually for all images in Category:Baptismal fonts in Sweden if they aren't PD-OLD or to simple to be art. /Hangsna (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have looked at other pictures in Category:Bertil Vallien. Would it be acceptable if File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int05.jpg and File:SanktaMariakyrkaUppsala int06.jpg were uploaded at license {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}? Ulkl (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- No, license isn't the problem here. /Hangsna (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- At least it is a two dimensional picture of a three dimensional object. I refer to discussion Sommaröppna kyrkor. Ulkl (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- This images is not an image of the building. Its an image of a 3-d object made by an artist, it can not be counted as a building just because its indoor. /Hangsna (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- At least it is a two dimensional picture of a three dimensional object. I refer to discussion Sommaröppna kyrkor. Ulkl (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- No, license isn't the problem here. /Hangsna (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, there is freedom of panorama in Sweden indoors also, but not for art. As this is piece of art, it is not protected with freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
