Commons:Deletion requests/File:S10Image.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a vector graphics. There is no advantage compared to File:S10Image.PNG. Leyo 18:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the file with .svg format from photoshop Williamseanohliner

I am sorry, but it is still an embedded raster image. You can verify this here. --Leyo 22:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also dispute the licensing. The Wavefunction company logo, the product-name, and the rendered molecule all appear to be taken from the company website, which does not assert any sort of free licensing, and only the product-name could be reasonably construed as "non-copyrightable stylized text". The OTRS ticket is not from a Wavefunction email address, so I think this whole image is a copyvio (unless we can get better confirmation that uploader does have corp permission, obviously). File:S10Image.PNG is currently marked creative-commons, so if this one here is truly PD, that one there should be also: they are either literal image-content dups or else I could just recreate that one as a rendering of this one and claim it PD as derivative of this PD one. DMacks (talk) 07:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • In my role as an OTRS agent, I recontacted the the original sender of the permission statement and asked that they reply using an official "Wavefunction" email address, which they have now done. I am 100% satisfied that the actual copyright holder has granted adequate permission. Tiptoety talk 17:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What about adding the OTRS ticket to File:S10Image.PNG? --Leyo 23:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]