Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ruben Meiller.jpg
<PA removed> Just some random photo <PA removed>? 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Tangent discussion unrelated to DR. Ignore.
|
|---|
|
That's racist. User:The SVG Effect 20:46, 27 June 2020
Uh, technically, it's racism. User:The SVG Effect 21:08, 27 June 2020 |
Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete This is the picture of an OoS person uploaded by a random visitor. (Closing Admin: Please also strike or remove the rude words at the nomination. I did so in another DR by this IP.) E4024 (talk) 01:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment The subject on the photo could be Ruben Storck, which has a dewiki article. However, it's not yet confirmed by dewiki reviewers, so I'm going to be neutral on this one for now. pandakekok9 01:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Is Ruben Storck also known as Ruben Meiller? If they look like each other than maybe they can use the image of Ruben Meiller at the article of Ruben Storck... E4024 (talk) 02:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's what I thought too. As I said above, it's not yet confirmed by dewiki's pending reviewers, so I wouldn't add the image there yet. And I'm not sure if anyone noticed, but the name in the author field in the EXIF data is different from the uploader's username. But I will AGF there and assume that the uploader's username is just a pseudonym of "Rolf Schmitt". After all, there are no similar images to be found in Google, so I'd assume this is own work. pandakekok9 02:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- The person in the image looked so OoS to me that I did not examine the EXIF. Now you are telling me this is not even an "own work". Delete twice in this case. E4024 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- You misunderstood what I said. I assume this is own work, because there aren't any similar images to be found on Google, which means this is a unique photo. "Rolf Schmitt" may as well just be the real name of the uploader. The only thing that's keeping me from !voting keep is the scope problem. pandakekok9 05:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- The person in the image looked so OoS to me that I did not examine the EXIF. Now you are telling me this is not even an "own work". Delete twice in this case. E4024 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's what I thought too. As I said above, it's not yet confirmed by dewiki's pending reviewers, so I wouldn't add the image there yet. And I'm not sure if anyone noticed, but the name in the author field in the EXIF data is different from the uploader's username. But I will AGF there and assume that the uploader's username is just a pseudonym of "Rolf Schmitt". After all, there are no similar images to be found in Google, so I'd assume this is own work. pandakekok9 02:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The subject of the photo appears to be a semi-notable cellist from Hamburg or training in Hamburg. The uploader may be Anke Dieterle from Akademie Hamburg. She is unlikely to also be Rolf Schmitt, the person named in the EXIF as copyright holder. I think there is too much unknown to assume this file is correctly licensed. FredWalsh (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per FredWalsh. Nice research! --pandakekok9 08:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per FredWalsh. It may or may not be out of scope, but the possibility of copyright violation supports the deletion. --Ahmadtalk 11:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
