Commons:Deletion requests/File:Richterweg 29. Bild 1.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Richterweg 29. Bild 1.JPG

Ich fordere Sie auf das Foto in dieser und jeglicher anderer Veröffentlichung zu löschen! Sie haben hier Bilder / Fotos von Privateigentum erstellt, hierzu haben Sie keine Zustimmung des Eigentümers! Um genau dieses Bild mit dem Blickwinkel zu erstellen, musste das private Grundstück betreten werden und dafür liegt, bzw. lag Ihnen keine Genehmigung vor. Im Falle einer nicht Löschung behalte ich mir vor, rechtliche Schritte gegen Sie einzuleiten. --47.64.106.233 16:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

I've converted the IP-created speedy into regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

The IP user claims that the image was not taken from public ways or places and that private grounds must have been entered to take the image. I'm not fully sure but I fear the IP user could be right, so the view would indeed not be covered by FoP Germany. If someone else wants to check, I assume the following photographer's position:

(previously assumed location removed) --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Regards, -Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Comment, posted by original uploader to the image-page: "Kann von Wikipedia n gelöscht werden. Bild wurde nicht von Privatgrundstück aufgenommen. Dennoch kann es natürlich Bildlich von der Wikipedianichen Bildfläche verschwinden." --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Looking at the map, one sees that the photo shows the house from its western corner. That does not fit to the camera position given above. --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Why shouldn't the position be correct? Of course the the building was photographed on its western corner. Please look also for the shed and the bushes. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Similar situation on 19 February 2021

I have been on the spot today, please find a similar image to the right. I'm still not sure whether the original photograph being discussed here is covered by FoP Germany or not. I'm quite sure, though, that the coordinates, which I assumed a few days ago are not fully correct. I have removed them now to avoid misunderstandings. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

• Is it not possible to identify the architect? Given the age of the building, there's maybe a 50% or so probability that the architect has been dead for 70 years. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

---

Deleted: thanks for the photo from the similar spot. It seems that the photo was taken from some elevated position, otherwise it would have been partially closed by the fence. As COM:FOP Germany says "When a photographer has used special tools (such as a ladder) to create the picture or has taken the picture after removing objects that otherwise would have shielded the work from the public eye (think of a photographer brushing aside the branches of a hedge to get a better view of a sculpture), § 59(1) cannot be relied upon for the resulting view is no longer part of what the general public can visually perceive from the public place." So, I bet it is right to delete this photo. --rubin16 (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)