Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reconquest dry opaque.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reconquest dry opaque.png

This, and pretty much everything contained in User:Meow/Characters/Meow/Reconquest for starts, fails COM:PARTYPICS; it's promotional, of limited use to commons, and is basically a private image collection (I'd also argue there's extremely dubious argument for the educational use of this. David Fuchs (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The amount of images may be a lot, but they are shared publicly and vary much. Moreover, as a few are used in some Wikimedia projects and the others may potentially be used, it is basically not a private image collection, and I did release only a small portion on Commons. All well-drawn artworks are suitable for educational usages, and it is subjective to judge. The series is actually the first complete ‘fursona’ on Wikimedia Commons, giving some historical values to the artworks for the furry fandom. 🐱💬 02:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how various lubed variations on the same drawing makes a "complete" fursona, and why that's important for Commons to have. What is the realistic educational use for these per COM:NOTUSED? David Fuchs (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have a proposal of removing unnecessary images but keeping primary ones, for making sure about following the rules as much as we can and still retaining the value of a series of the well-drawn artwork.
Here are the images that must be kept, based on originality of the artwork and usages on Wikimedia Commons:
All the others can be removed for being variations. If you agree with my proposal, I could submit another deletion request by myself and replace this one, so the progression will be faster for being requested by the original uploader. 🐱💬 09:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep some are in use and the others help provide context and other variations of the image for potential reusers. Elli (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - David Fuchs and 🐱 Well, this is the first time I've seen the word "fursona." Regardless, many of these images appear as personal artwork. Whether some are in use or not. Personal artwork - of a notable subject or not - is out of scope for Commons. Anyway, please list the images you are nominating for deletion here, those that are not in use. As a reviewer, it's not my job to go through and find them myself. They shoudl be listed here unless it's literally a blanket deletion of a total category for obvious reasons. Thanks everyone. Ping me when it's completed. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Basically everything in the category not mentioned above (plus a .webp file) can be removed. For references, I still list them (43 files) here:
The remaining six files are the foundation of the artwork and they should not be removed at all. For the others, please delete them as soon as possible and close this discussion. 🐱💬 18:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Next time please us the mass deletion tool. Please don't simply say to delete "pretty much" everything in a category. It is less burdensome to do a mass deletion request for us volunteer reviewers. Thanks. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reconquest dry opaque.png

File:Reconquest dry opaque.png

Navigation menu

Search