Commons:Deletion requests/File:Radio AIWA.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Also:
- File:AIWA CD／MD MICRO COMPONENT XR-H330MD YEAR1999.JPG
- File:AIWA TPR-950 - 4 Band Radio Cassette Recorder.jpg
Per COM:DMCA request at: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35213342?access_token=HAd8l-M7tMUz8fAh7pLWlg Lord Gingham (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Question. Aiwa is a Japanese manufacturer and now it is a subsidiary of Sony in Japan. This DMCA Complaint to Google, said "Sent on July 29, 2023 COUNTRY: AT 🇦🇹" (from Austria). Is this DMCA Complaint valid ? I don't understand what it means. --Clusternote (talk) 15:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Clusternote: It means that is linked to OnlyFans website followed on Google search and delisted from results with a DMCA takedown notice via Lumen Database. Lord Gingham (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- It seems a strange explanation. Although the top of this DMCA Complaint page is a site "[https://]onlyfans.com/aiwaonly" , however it seems merely a subscription service similar to a porno site, and they may have no rights for AIWA products at all. This deletion request seems meaningless for my eyes. --Clusternote (talk) 22:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Should we relisted on Google Search instead via counternotice on Lumen? Lord Gingham (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- It seems a strange explanation. Although the top of this DMCA Complaint page is a site "[https://]onlyfans.com/aiwaonly" , however it seems merely a subscription service similar to a porno site, and they may have no rights for AIWA products at all. This deletion request seems meaningless for my eyes. --Clusternote (talk) 22:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Clusternote: It means that is linked to OnlyFans website followed on Google search and delisted from results with a DMCA takedown notice via Lumen Database. Lord Gingham (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep These photos come from three different people: two from Flickr, where they don't seem to be cases of license laundering and where the license was verified by the bot (and in fact, still valid as I just checked myself), and one from a Commons contributor who has several uploads that use the same camera according to the EXIF. I'm afraid we are going to need more evidence than a vague DMCA takedown notice. Furthermore, a DMCA notice served to WMF will be handled by office personnel, not through a deletion request. —holly {chat} 05:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. I don't see any evidence of copyright violation. So if there is a DMCA notice, let's allow the WMF lawyers to handle it. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
