Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic official emblem.gif
Emblem of the 2018 Winter Olympics - Copyrighted 195.169.141.54 12:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete I have recreated the file in en.wikipedia. Hektor (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Most olympic logos are very complicated and therefore copyrighted. This one is not. The olympic rings we already have on Commons, the rest is extremely simple rectangles and an asterisk.
Keep Fry1989 eh? 15:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- And you have a something, a statement by the PyeongChang organizing committee for instance, to support your assertion that this logo is not copyrighted ? I notice for instance that on the PyeongChang website the logo has a ™ attached to it but that it has conveniently been edited from the image posted on Commons Hektor (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to have something from an organisation specifically stating they're logo or symbol is PD. We have tonnes of logos on here without such a written notice saying they're PD. PD-textlogo, PD-shape and PD-simple all apply. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- No they don't. This logo has no ground to be in Commons. And we are dealing with an organization, the IOC, which is very protective of intellectual and artistic property. Hektor (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, they absolutely do. Are you aware that the olympic rings are already here? So take them out of this image. Do you really believe what is left, that 4 rectangles forming a very nondescript shape and an asterisk, are enough to form a copyright? I'm sorry to burst your bubble but this is a case of "sad day for them". They chose a logo that is too simple, it is PD. Fry1989 eh? 22:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to burst YOUR bubble but the IOC had the Sochi 2014 logo removed from Commons and it was far less complicated than this one. Hektor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have been doealing with copyright on Commons for 3 years, I know what is simple and not. Sochi's was removed because it uses a distinct font that was specifically created for the logo. This one does not. This is PD simple, PD shape and PD textlogo. Sad day for them, you can't protect something that is too simple for copyright in the first place. Fry1989 eh? 23:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to burst YOUR bubble but the IOC had the Sochi 2014 logo removed from Commons and it was far less complicated than this one. Hektor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, they absolutely do. Are you aware that the olympic rings are already here? So take them out of this image. Do you really believe what is left, that 4 rectangles forming a very nondescript shape and an asterisk, are enough to form a copyright? I'm sorry to burst your bubble but this is a case of "sad day for them". They chose a logo that is too simple, it is PD. Fry1989 eh? 22:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- No they don't. This logo has no ground to be in Commons. And we are dealing with an organization, the IOC, which is very protective of intellectual and artistic property. Hektor (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't have to have something from an organisation specifically stating they're logo or symbol is PD. We have tonnes of logos on here without such a written notice saying they're PD. PD-textlogo, PD-shape and PD-simple all apply. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- And you have a something, a statement by the PyeongChang organizing committee for instance, to support your assertion that this logo is not copyrighted ? I notice for instance that on the PyeongChang website the logo has a ™ attached to it but that it has conveniently been edited from the image posted on Commons Hektor (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Most olympic logos are very complicated and therefore copyrighted. This one is not. The olympic rings we already have on Commons, the rest is extremely simple rectangles and an asterisk.
- Keep: As Fry1989 mentioned, {{Pd-textlogo}} applies here, because the simple forms in the logo does not meet the treshold of originillaty. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple logo, even I am able to do that. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Recreated after deletion for an Administrator. Copyrighted Olympic logo. And remember that you are individually responsible for what you upload. Hektor (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- It was immediately restored because it is too simple for copyright. Denniss may not understand that, but Fastily did. You also don't understand copyright. This is too simple. PD-textlogo, PD-Shape and PD-ineligible ALL apply.
- Anybody new to this DR should be aware that while the image was initially deleted by Denniss, a proper reasoning was not provided and the image was immediately restored through unDR. Fry1989 eh? 01:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Further to what Fry mentioned. 99.229.41.79 01:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy close: the logo is in the public domain. I actually undeleted per a formal undeletion request. The logo is a textbook instance of failure to pass the threshold of originality because it consists of geometric shapes which are too simple in nature to qualify for copyright protection. -FASTILY 07:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The image is an incorrect reproduction of the original logo. The ™ sign next to 2018 has been omitted. Hektor (talk) 10:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Speedily, this is an abuse of the DR process and a trivial reason to nominate an image. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy close yet again, same reason as above. -FASTILY 18:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
An svg version is keep without deletion request 2605:BA00:4138:155:FD66:6234:D89A:C194 21:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
speedy kept (non-admin closure) Not a reason for deletion, see COM:DUPE and COM:INUSE. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
