Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porta Nuova Skyline.jpg
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
There is no FoP in Italy and the image is copied here. Dega180 (talk) 10:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, we know...but this is clearly a rendering and not a photo, just enlarge the picture... --Conte di Cavour (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes this is a rendering but it is a rendering copied from the official project protected by copyright.--Dega180 (talk) 17:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- 1) The link that you put is from a well-known skyscraper amateur website and not an official renedring. In all likelihood the uploader is the author himself. And you do not have any evidence about who copied who. 2) In every case, the reason for deleting indicated by you is technically wrong. So, you should delete this request and start a new one on different grounds since this is neither a real picture nor a violation of a no-Fop law. --Conte di Cavour (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- This photo is copyied by here (see also [1]) because in the commons photo the bottom part (whith copyright mark) has been cut. This photo is copyed from another and is in a copyright violation.--Dega180 (talk) 09:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- I will write to the author and ask for permit, I'm sure that he will agree. Conte di Cavour
- 1) The link that you put is from a well-known skyscraper amateur website and not an official renedring. In all likelihood the uploader is the author himself. And you do not have any evidence about who copied who. 2) In every case, the reason for deleting indicated by you is technically wrong. So, you should delete this request and start a new one on different grounds since this is neither a real picture nor a violation of a no-Fop law. --Conte di Cavour (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-6Yj6E84TNxg/TXZQeeoOOKI/AAAAAAAAHns/ElJmAH9QLik/s1600/PanoPortaNuovaNew.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 07:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
In EXIF-data it sais: "LRTimelapse 3.2.1 - licensed to Alessandro Muiesan, 20148 - Private License, no commercial use allowed!". Also {{NoFoP-Italy}} Also see previously DR(s): 1. Josve05a (talk) 00:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Info Uploaded by Obliot (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 25.12.2013 and previously published via "Alessandro"'s Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/"obliot"/ (which would explain the exif-credit "Alessandro Muiesan") = https://www.flickr.com/photos/obliot/10826401273 (12.11.2013, all rights reserved by " Alessandro", identical exif). Most of the other uploads (if not all) by @Obliot: were previously uploaded as "all rights reserved" on Flickr. Under hard terms, permission and/or further clarification needed. Alternatively: COM:GOODFAITH assuming that user "Obliot" is the same Flickr user... or? Gunnex (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We need more evidence of permission and FOP is also a concern but you can argue that the copyrighted elements are DM. Natuur12 (talk) 12:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
