Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pope Francis CoA.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is simply wrong. The correct one (in accordance with Vatican's website http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/index.htm) is in File:Signum Francisci I.svg Sentausa (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

supported by me --Cum Deo (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I feel sorry for Cerrigno, but if the coat of arms of Poznaniak is more correct it is right to cancel his coat of arms, as was done for that of Cum Deo. --InfattiVedeteCheViDice (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me sir, but I am aware of that logic. please just mind your own business. --Cum Deo (talk) 16:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In order to that also delete File:COA Franciscus.svg --Cum Deo (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Yes, coat is wrong, keys in orignal coat are scuare but not round. However that is not a reason for deletion according to COM:D. Check this: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Us-civil.svg. In order to provide an correct image, the coat should be replaced by an a correct image (for encyclopedic purposes). Meanwhile, that image is useful.--SirWalter (talk) 18:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In fact there is already a correct version, which is File:Signum Francisci I.svg by Poznaniak. --InfattiVedeteCheViDice (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keys updated. Now the image should be ok. Furthermore, my image has been build using previous free svg, while the current one (File:Signum Francisci I.svg) is an automatic conversion from the original PNG, created with CorelDRAW. However, I have user its keys in order to update my file to a more correct appearence. The tiara of File:BXVI CoA like gfx PioM.svg is also nicer than the other... --Cerrigno (talk) 23:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why Cerrigno? What's the matter? now yours is exactly the same and redudant. as you complained about my work. what the hell is wrong with you and InfattiVedeteCheViDice? --Cum Deo (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is a duplicate - or very, very close to in all aspects - of other SVGs which have a more correct banner. As the deletion request is already open here it makes sense to remove this one in lieu of others. NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 19:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Ok, now it's really obsolete. --Cerrigno (talk) 23:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 22:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]