Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peter Baykov Red Carpet.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published in October 2019 (https://www.instagram.com/p/B3pQ5eBjklC/?hl=en). Needs permission from photographer (not the subject) via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reference url provided by Howhontanozaz is non-existen and the claim is irrelevant as the original owner of the file has provided it to Wikimedia. (DW78832 (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Howhontanozaz Your claim to have the photo deleted is invalid as the Instagram link is not real and the claim is irrelevant, as the copyright owner has provided the original full image to Wikimedia Commons.(DW78832 (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

To whoever closes this request, please note that the Instagram user deleted this particular post minutes after I filed this request. As stated above, the Instagram post was dated October 2019. If you look at the file in question, in the metadata, you can see the FBMD data indicating that it originated from either Facebook or Instagram. Who would you trust, a diligent Commons-contributor or a user with little to no Commons contributions before this debacle? I trust in the wisdom of this community. Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, the Instagram user in question still has the photo used as his profile photo https://www.instagram.com/thepeterbaykov which I also took a screenshot of because apparently, both archive.org and archive.is cannot archive instagram feeds. Screenshot can be found here https://imgur.com/a/4P9AKaH. Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Howhontanozaz Your statement is completely untrue and regardless of your angle here, you have absolutely no prove to support your claim about the link - it's invalid. The matter is not about "trust", but solid facts to support it, which your argument lacks indeed. (DW78832 (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

As the original owner of the copyright of this photo, I have granted the necessary permissions to Wikimedia Commons to display it on the platform with the means necessary. The Instagram link provided by Howhontanozaz is invalid which makes the claim unreasonable. There's nothing that proves your statement and such "debacles" are groundless without reference materials to prove your point. (Pbaykov (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

@Pbaykov: If you are the copyright holder, then please follow the instructions outlined in COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbaykov: One question though, you share the same name as the subject of the photograph. If I assume that you are Mr. Baykov, please explain how you became the copyright holder of the photo. I can see your hands in the photo thus I can conclude that thiz isn't a selfie. Please take note that the copyright holder is usually the person who clicked the button unless its a work-for-hire. Please elaborate. Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, can be undeleted when and if the ticket is properly approved by OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]