Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penisss.jpeg
6 closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penisss.jpeg
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This user post these pictures without the permission. Other pictures of this person has been deleted uploaded by tuxdiary before. I have seen this today. 2001:250:4001:201:F1CA:23CA:3490:6418 13:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unauthorized Publishing. This user published unauthorized work without permission. See his posts history. 218.197.152.103 12:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Kept: no evidence has been provided that there would be a permission problem - in use, so in scope. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This picture is mine and this doctor upload it without my knowledge. 2001:250:4001:201:DDD9:D95B:CA2D:9AB2 16:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Most people are identified by their faces rather than by normally-hidden body parts, and I seriously doubt there is any way the requester (even if it is only the one) has any real fear of being identified. So I discount privacy as a serious reason for deletion, and if there is any residual issue here it should be dealt with by way of OTRS rather than in a public forum. I make no comment on the fact that the image has been here for five years without complaint. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
out of scope 207.233.110.67 19:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: scope is irrelevant as this image is COM:INUSE. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Post without permission 47.74.4.188 18:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Kept: This request adds nothing to previous ones and is therefore speedily closed. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File is not in used 119.156.89.226 19:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC) |
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Porn only used for vandalism posts at this point in time. We have plenty of images of hard cocks. No need to keep this one when it isn't being used and it is outside of scope. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Well, according to the other DRs on this image, this has been in use for a long time, so this is not a reason for deletion. And it's also old enough, so COM:PENIS doesn't apply. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per PaterMcFly 20 upper 17:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept|per consensus, for the seventh time. Wow... (non-admin closure) ClydeFranklin (t/c) 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)}}