Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penis erection (6 pictures).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

picture quality extrem poor 88.69.8.206 10:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete very small.... er... quality. --Damiens.rf 20:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment a series of photos showing stages in a penis becoming erect does have educational value. It is true that the quality is not perfect. Can our nominator assure us that they reviewed the images of penii we have on hand, to compare this sequence of photos with other sequences showing the steps in erection? If they haven't performed due diligence I think this is an open and shut case for keep. Even if the collection of images of penii does include other sequences this sequence may still contain educational value. Not all penii are the same. Geo Swan (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Okay, further to above, I checked myself. There are a couple of other sequences in our collection of images, including File:Stages.jpg and File:Penis.jpeg. These other sequences of images aren't ideal either. Seven billion individuals currently live on planet Earth. Possibly 500 million pre-pubescent boys live on planet Earth, for whom a sequence showing a normal size penis become erect would be highly educational. A sequence showing erection would be similarly educational for girls and women who haven't had sex yet, or who still lack knowledge on male anatomy, because they always had sex in the dark. Geo Swan (talk) 23:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further comment -- since my earlier comment I took a look at our current collection of penii. I have read comments about our collection from contributors who seem to be saying they think our collection is already large enough, and varied enough. I disagree. I think our collection should be larger. Our collection seems to have a slant in favor of images of artistic as opposed to pedagogic value. Our collection seems to have a slant in favor of images of unusually large penii, or of penii of men who shave their pubic hair. I think it would be best if a large fraction of our images represented penii of average size, and hirsuteness. I think it be a good idea if our collection included images of penii of a wider range of skin colors. Penii with genuine medical conditions, like venereal warts, and other lesions would also be of value. Geo Swan (talk) 23:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep (non-admin) We have an abundance of large caucasian penises, but I can't recall seeing better versions of a Chinese ethnicity male becoming erect. Pitke (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Sequence may have educational use. Not just another penis picture. --Simonxag (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kept, Thuresson (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

low resoluted, low quality images of a mans penis. {{We have enough of them}} --D-Kuru (talk) 07:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep -- This image was just nominated for deletion on 2009-11-23 nominated for deletion in August. That discussion closed as keep on 2009-12-07 -- three weeks ago, with 3 for keep and just 1 for deletion. I left comments explaining why I thought this image should be kept. I am frankly insulted that the nominator didn't address the strong arguments for preservation, which were expressed very recently. I wrote then, in part: "Seven billion individuals currently live on planet Earth. Possibly 500 million pre-pubescent boys live on planet Earth, for whom a sequence showing a normal size penis become erect would be highly educational. A sequence showing erection would be similarly educational for girls and women who haven't had sex yet, or who still lack knowledge on male anatomy, because they always had sex in the dark." Geo Swan (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept again --DieBuche (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]