Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nap08 705.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
porn 87.194.75.45 10:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Out of project scope. Commons:Projektrahmen: „die Aussage „Commonst wird nicht zensiert“, kann kein zulässiges Argument sein, Dateien außerhalb des erlaubten Projektrahmens auf Commons zu behalten, wie weiter oben erklärt. Fotografien von Nacktheit oder männlicher und weiblicher Genitalien werden manchmal aus nicht-aufklärerischen Motiven hochgeladen. Und solche Bilder sind nicht von der Notwendigkeit, den Regeln des Projektrahmens zu entsprechen, ausgenommen. Oftmals – aber nicht immer – fügen solche Bilder keinen eigenständigen aufklärerischen Aspekt zu den Vorrat an bereits vorhandenen Bildern hinzu. Daher sind sie tatsächlich nicht nützlich für einen aufklärerischen Zweck.“ -- smial (talk) 10:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep Good, high quality image. Person is not identify. No reason for deletion.--Avril1975 (talk) 22:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)- Keep It's not porn. It doesn't meet any standard of pornography and furthermore it does illustrate a certain type of piercing. Its just as ridiculous as these requests (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Barbara Clit.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lauren Nipple by Tommy T.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lizas Labiaplastie.jpg).--Lamilli (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Clear image of unidentified person with two piercings, why delete? --Mitch3000 (talk) 06:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep this is no porn but a high quality picture about piercing and tattoo. ---Nicor (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Good picture, no porn, unable to identify subjects. No proof of underage --> no reason for deletion.--Buster Baxter (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete used in no article, I'm not convinced that an encyclopaedic use ist possible. Achates (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Good quality, no porn, inside project scope. Raymond Disc. 10:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Not a valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
