Commons:Deletion requests/File:Namacalathus.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Namacalathus.png

very low-quality drawing, not useful for nothing, there are much better life restorations, see Namacalathus.svg + Namacalathus hermanastes.jpg Gretarsson (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

• It was used for eight months in w:Namacalathus so not completely useless. But I agree it is not useful any more due to poor quality. I was surprised that two other low quality drawings I did at the same time are in use: File:Cyclomedusa.png and File:Palaeopascichnus.png (via derivative), Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

IMHO all three images/drawings are clearly of non-publishable quality (the more rediculous it is, that the Palaeopacichnus.png has even been converted to SVG format). Remember that Wikipedia calls itself an encyclopedia, so drawings should meet a minimum quality standard. --Gretarsson (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Palaeopascichnus.png has also been used off wiki so I would want to keep it around. But for Namacalathus.png I am happy for it to go or stay, so that is a neutral. The conversion to .svg was probably a bit of overenthusiasm from two other better drawings on a similar topic that I did, that have now been used by National Geographic and Discovery Magazine. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)