Commons:Deletion requests/File:N62AF January 1982.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No link for the DOT image, so there is no evidence that it is indeed a DOT PD work russavia (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep only if we can get more specific sourcing for it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you mean delete, because that is how Commons works if there is unknown sourcing; delete until we get more specific sourcing. russavia (talk) 06:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- You know what I mean. :-) This is kind of a "duh" situation in any case, so it doesn't really matter what my !vote is. If it gets the proper source to verify the license, it stays. If the source is either unacceptable or nonexistent, then it goes, and no amount of !votes will change that. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you mean delete, because that is how Commons works if there is unknown sourcing; delete until we get more specific sourcing. russavia (talk) 06:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: I checked the enwp description page, and there is also no source there. Courcelles (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
