Commons:Deletion requests/File:Musköbasen, kontroll, 2017.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This picture depicts a Swedish military installation which is illegal to photograph by Swedish law, as evident by the yellow sign in the picture. See Skyddsobjekt. JayC (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)- Delete //Joshua (talk) 18:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I99pema (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep: That falls into the category of Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. In particular, a restriction on taking the photo need not translate into a prohibition on hosting it. The picture is in use on de:Marinehafen Muskö and sv:Muskö, so we should be reluctant to delete it. --bjh21 (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- That might be true, but the deletion is in this case also requested by the creator, who in this case is the one risking heavy fines (in worst case according to recent media reports). The community should show some good-will towards the contributors in cases like this, regardless if Wikimedia has the rights on their sideI99pema (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment The statute of limitations is two years in this case. Edaen (talk) 05:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)- Comment The picture is no longer in use on de:Marinehafen Muskö and sv:Muskö.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- That might be true, but the deletion is in this case also requested by the creator, who in this case is the one risking heavy fines (in worst case according to recent media reports). The community should show some good-will towards the contributors in cases like this, regardless if Wikimedia has the rights on their sideI99pema (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Iantriks (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason for deletion would have been as a service to the uploader, but since the act is no longer prosecutable that is no longer of practical significance. Edaen (talk) 06:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edaen Where can I learn more about the statute of limitations in this case? I99pema (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @I99pema In Skyddslagen, 30 a § Den som uppsåtligen eller av oaktsamhet bryter mot ett förbud mot att göra avbildningar, beskrivningar eller mätningar som avses i 7 § andra eller tredje stycket döms för olovlig avbildning av skyddsobjekt till böter eller fängelse i högst ett år. Lag (2018:611). read together with BrB 35:1, 1 § Påföljd må ej ådömas, med mindre den misstänkte häktats eller erhållit del av åtal för brottet inom 1. två år, om å brottet ej kan följa svårare straff än fängelse i ett år Edaen (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tack, Edaen, det var ju bra att veta! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @I99pema In Skyddslagen, 30 a § Den som uppsåtligen eller av oaktsamhet bryter mot ett förbud mot att göra avbildningar, beskrivningar eller mätningar som avses i 7 § andra eller tredje stycket döms för olovlig avbildning av skyddsobjekt till böter eller fängelse i högst ett år. Lag (2018:611). read together with BrB 35:1, 1 § Påföljd må ej ådömas, med mindre den misstänkte häktats eller erhållit del av åtal för brottet inom 1. två år, om å brottet ej kan följa svårare straff än fängelse i ett år Edaen (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edaen Where can I learn more about the statute of limitations in this case? I99pema (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --A.Savin 14:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
