Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mumtaz (actress).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely to be a scan of an old print from some magazine. The pose doesn't look like something the actress would give while being photographed. Looks like a screenshot of some dance. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This photo of Mumtaz is during the shoot of an actual dance sequence of film Taangewala. The dance was in the open street where the photo was taken. It is not a capture of the screen shot from the movie/video. Obviously, the old print was scanned and uploaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juhi47 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 17 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]
Please prove it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know as to what kind of proof is required. Anyway, please see

a. the song in 'Do deewane aaye...' in the movie Taangewala.
b. the full resolution picture which would prove that it is neither a screen shot, nor a scan of a print from a magazine or calendar.
c. the scan once again and you can clearly see the micro-cracks in the photo which have appeared probably due to aging. And I feel that its colour has also 'faded'.

If you are still unsatisfied, you can have a look at the actual photograph with me, which is one of my 'prized' possession. And if you have some other photographs of hers, which you could share with me, I would be extremely glad to have. ---Juhi47

So, what more now is required to remove the 'Deletion Request'? ---Juhi47


Deleted: Sorry, we can't keep this as there may well be extant copyright in the old photo itself, which was not taken by the you. Ownership of an old print does not mean it's allowable to scan it and upload it here, as copyright does not generally get transferred on purchase of an old photo. We would need a licence from the copyright owner, which is not likely to be possible if we don't know who took the picture MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear to me as to how it was construed that I did not take this photo myself. The photo has been deleted without giving me a proper opportunity. Hence, I request you to please undelete it. --Juhi47
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a deleted image Vensatry (Ping me) 12:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for deleting the file are not clear.


Deleted -FASTILY 04:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]