Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mother carries her child.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:IDENT violation. Location is identified as Tenerife. No evidence of consent has been provided. Additionally, I viewed the source page and found no licensing information - did I just miss it? How are licensed confirmed for images taken from Google accounts? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep likely some disruptive Dr. This is not a violation of com:ident. Obviously a public place - surely not a private beach. The license is definately ok - an admin uploaded it and another trusted confirmed the licensing. Besides the site can easily be opened and the licensing can easiliy be checked. Really no basis for deleting this image. // Michael P

Other than Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Spain, you mean?  Delete. --Conti| 14:58, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment One should think of the possibility that the person depicted in the image agreed with the publication of the image of her. The photographer seems to be a professional photographer who uploads his works on picasa - including his journeys with his family. Possibly shows this image a family member whom he asked. --High Contrast (talk) 21:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is certainly possible, but the possibility is not sufficient. Lacking any positive confirmation that they gave consent, this is in violation of COM:IDENT because it is in violation of Spanish laws regarding images. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In Spain, consent is required for publishing any photograph of an identifiable person regardless of whether it is in a public or private space. If it were a portrait photograph, I think we could reasonably assume consent, but in this case it does not seem certain that consent was given. Thus, we must err on the side of the subject's right to privacy, per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Spain. If the photographer were to add an assertion of consent to the Picasa page or email it to OTRS, I would be happy to undelete. Kaldari (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]