Commons:Deletion requests/File:Molded white bra.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The relevant cats are full of much better images. For outstanding examples please see File:Brassiere-white.jpg and File:Two pairs of briefs at fashion show.png, for instance. Or look at File:Model in black lingerie at Western Canada Fashion Week 2016 Spring - Edmonton.jpg to see an image -of a professional model- without the face half cut as in this case. E4024 (talk) 08:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Keep the first image is black and white, the second image is only of underwear and the third linked image is of a model which could be considered "promotional" when using as one could argue that she's getting paid for it while this "anonymised" photograph doesn't reveal the face and only showcases the subject. I am not arguing that this type of imagry should be encouraged, only that this particular image isn't necessarily of bad quality and that It's useable. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- What about the other images in the same cats? --E4024 (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Hello. Dear E4024, i agree that your examples of women's lingerie are technical and artistic much more better. But "molded bra" is a specific type of women's brassierie, characterized by formed cups. Your examples show other types of bras Of course, if Wikimedia repository contain the better photos of molded bras then deletion of my photo is reasonable. Regards Stan old (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello dear ol' Stan. I appreciate your knowledge on bras. I also appreciate your expressing your views kindly; something I miss in Commons at times. OTOH I would prefer to have less images of this kind in Commons, as we pretend to be a serious "general" source. I would not like to think that people enter our pages looking for nudity. (There are better sources for that.) It may be the favourite area of work of many Commoners, but please note that I'm not saying that we should not have nudity; I'm only sure that the proportion of nudity-related material in Commons is much more than the place it has in real life. I would like to see some statistics: Have we got enough "food" in Commons, for instance? Enough "literature"? Enough "music"? Enough "sports"? Enough "politics"? (Not referring to pics of people with kalashnikovs.) What is the proportion of images in those areas to "nude or partially nude women"?.. (BTW how many cats have we got which contain this formula? :) At least you're not adding more material to our huge (I mean in number :) penis collection, AFAICS. Have I already voted to delete? This is an out of scope and unused personal "partial female nudity" pic. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. Dear E4024, i respect your opinion, although i do not quite agree with it. I also thank You for the kind words, that the people can compare arguments without quarrels. Regards Stan old (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello dear ol' Stan. I appreciate your knowledge on bras. I also appreciate your expressing your views kindly; something I miss in Commons at times. OTOH I would prefer to have less images of this kind in Commons, as we pretend to be a serious "general" source. I would not like to think that people enter our pages looking for nudity. (There are better sources for that.) It may be the favourite area of work of many Commoners, but please note that I'm not saying that we should not have nudity; I'm only sure that the proportion of nudity-related material in Commons is much more than the place it has in real life. I would like to see some statistics: Have we got enough "food" in Commons, for instance? Enough "literature"? Enough "music"? Enough "sports"? Enough "politics"? (Not referring to pics of people with kalashnikovs.) What is the proportion of images in those areas to "nude or partially nude women"?.. (BTW how many cats have we got which contain this formula? :) At least you're not adding more material to our huge (I mean in number :) penis collection, AFAICS. Have I already voted to delete? This is an out of scope and unused personal "partial female nudity" pic. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- What about the other images in the same cats? --E4024 (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note to closing admins: I see very clearly that you have a lot of deletion work. I may be also be contributing to that burden, sorry; just doing what I feel right. Having said that, while this discussion has not yet been closed (with two keep opinions although for me it's an obvious delete) the file has entered in a mass DR also. Maybe those admins who are not so active or keep away from these discussions should be convinced to help their colleagues who work here, in closing DRs, with patience and certainly (nobody wants to lose friends :) sacrifice. --E4024 (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by User:Jcb while closing a different DR that also included this file. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
