Commons:Deletion requests/File:MethylCyclobutane1.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Low quality, not used anywhere, probably superseded by File:MethylCyclobutane.png. Leyo 21:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Keep unless an alternative is found. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Both images are equally unsatisfying. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete It's useless. The File:MethylCyclobutane.png is a bit better.--Vchorozopoulos (talk) 08:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)- Delete per Vchorozopoulos. One poor thing doesn't mean we should keep other poor things that are no better and/or redundant. DMacks (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- The alternative is very nearly according to the MOS guidelines for chemistry diagrams. In fact, I just redrew it exactly using them, and you can see in the thumbnail history how close it was. Now that it is per standard, I welcome specific comments about what is deficient about it. I'll start off the other way, and say that the nom'ed image has nonstandard bond angle for the methyl attachment, the ring–methyl bond is too short, one of the ring bonds extends slightly out of the ring at the top-right corner too, and the resolution is lower. DMacks (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, you improved the lettering on the newer version. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- The alternative is very nearly according to the MOS guidelines for chemistry diagrams. In fact, I just redrew it exactly using them, and you can see in the thumbnail history how close it was. Now that it is per standard, I welcome specific comments about what is deficient about it. I'll start off the other way, and say that the nom'ed image has nonstandard bond angle for the methyl attachment, the ring–methyl bond is too short, one of the ring bonds extends slightly out of the ring at the top-right corner too, and the resolution is lower. DMacks (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 14:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
