Commons:Deletion requests/File:Memorybank2019-萬安國小振興分校.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FoP for outdoor 2D artwork in Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- In Taiwan, FoP is also applicable to the outdoor 2D artwork. The 58 Article of Copyright Act (ROC) says:
- Artistic works or architectural works displayed on a long-term basis on streets, in parks, on outside walls of buildings, or other outdoor locales open to the public, may be exploited by any means except under the following circumstances:
- Reproduction of a building by construction of another building.
- Reproduction of a work of sculpture by production of another sculpture.
- Reproduction for the purpose of long-term public display in locales specified in this article.
- Reproduction of artistic works solely for the purpose of selling copies.
- It is for all outdoor artistic works, not only for 3D one.
- Here is another article in Intellectual Property Right Journal (智慧財產權月刊) issue 192, it says that base on the law, sell a postcard with photo of outdoor painted doesn't need authorization. The journal is published by Intellectual Property Office, Ministry of Economic Affairs, the competent authority of copyrights in Taiwan. I think the article is more credible than Kai's unfounded view.
- Would you please do some literature searching first and don't request deletion only by your own thinking?--Reke (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Boldly non-admin closed again as restored, that file was restored by the deletion admin per a separately discussion
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
See this Village Pump/Copyright discussion. Latest correspondences from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) reaffirmed that the non-commercial restriction for Taiwanese non-architecture extends to photographic reproductions like this image file. Since this photo shows the artwork intentionally, this cannot benefit from Taiwanese de minimis (in which the artwork must be incidental or at background). Correspondences in Chinese: [1] and [2]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
