Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manuel Azaña Ministro.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Two clear problems with licensing: relies on author dying before 1942, yet it indicated as anonymous; no tag covering the US. Grandiose (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- I would say
Keep with license changed to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done! License changed. Cvbr 11:13, 10 feb 2012 (UTC)
- What about it's status in the US? Grandiose (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Good point which I didn't think about when this DR started. This file does not comply with URAA (anon. work - 70 years after publication in Spain, not reached in 1996), and thus, together with thousands other files, falls under this debate. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Could you explain how the file would be in the public domain, URAA aside? I normally use this chart but I can't see which it would fall under. Grandiose (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is in public domain in Europe, but, according to URAA, not in the US, i.e. it can be uploaded on a local wiki. I just haven't followed what Commons decided to do with those thousands of images which don't comply with URAA. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- URAA aside, how would it be out of copyright in the US? I see quite a lot of files in a similar position, it would be nice to know. Grandiose (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Same here :-) Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- URAA aside, how would it be out of copyright in the US? I see quite a lot of files in a similar position, it would be nice to know. Grandiose (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is in public domain in Europe, but, according to URAA, not in the US, i.e. it can be uploaded on a local wiki. I just haven't followed what Commons decided to do with those thousands of images which don't comply with URAA. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Could you explain how the file would be in the public domain, URAA aside? I normally use this chart but I can't see which it would fall under. Grandiose (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Good point which I didn't think about when this DR started. This file does not comply with URAA (anon. work - 70 years after publication in Spain, not reached in 1996), and thus, together with thousands other files, falls under this debate. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 01:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Any files listed here that were deleted and which are in the public domain in New Zealand have been reuploaded under their original filenames at Wikilivres, a New Zealand wiki unaffiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.
|
