Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maly krab.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maly_krab.jpg

•  Delete Unusable (size of main topic) Lycaon (talk) 19:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Better resolution was uploaded. Lycaon (talk) 22:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
• It is not reason to delete. Julo (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

 Keep I'm with Julo. The picture hasn't anything wrong. Anyway it's true that a bigger image could have been more useful.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 22:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

It has nothing right neither. It is not identifiable and even hardly recognizable. Do we really have to keep such inferior quality stuff??? Lycaon (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Delete I'm with Lycaon -- "not identifiable and even hardly recognizable". It isn't at all useful without a category, so someone will have to categorize it, and that would be a waste of an expert's time.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Delete agree with above. ZooFari 15:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Delete per above. --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 21:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep I think we can keep this . --Mardetanha (talk) 23:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

• Did you identify it? ZooFari 14:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• Nah , does it really matter ? Mardetanha (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• Yes. Someone who want to keep it ought to identify it, if possible. Without an identification and category it's useless.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• It's crab Mardetanha (talk) 11:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

• Nope it's crap Lycaon (talk) 11:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

• so it's identified :D Mardetanha (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I've reuploaded the file in its original resolution and I cropped the crab. I'm still not able to identify it exactly (I'm just an amateur photographer, not a biologist), but I think now the expert's task will be much easier. Please reconsider your comments and votes. Ewa Dryjanska (talk) 22:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep OK, I've changed my opinion. I suggest that User:Ewa Dryjanska find an expert -- look through histories at Category:Grapsoidea for people who put categories on -- and get it categorized. Even without that, I think we can keep it.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Kept. Avi (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)