Commons:Deletion requests/File:Male Torso.JPG
Outside scope. -Nard the Bard 18:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment not very different from File:Bared Sandy in Washington.jpg which I planned to nominate for deletion, the other day, when I suddenly discovered that it was used. So perhaps File:Male_Torso.JPG can be used too. Teofilo (talk) 19:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
* 
Keep
Neutral It's not out of scope. One can argue that it is a bad crop and that the educational value is not very high. But somehow I have the feeling that you are just trying to make a point. Sorry about this!! Amada44 (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually I was going through a list of images Shakespearefan00 had marked as no license that had been actually been vandalized to remove the licenses. I wasn't sure this one was in scope. -Nard the Bard 22:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. I just looked at the image again an I noticed some white lines around the nippels moving down. Could those be scars? Maybe was the body a woman? The pubic hair seems non male too... Amada44 (talk) 07:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete What sense does this pic have? Right, none, out of scope and bad anyway. --Yikrazuul (talk) 21:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)- Delete - uploader blanked page previously, possibly requesting deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Just a male torso, I cannot see nothing bad. Luispihormiguero (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - low-quality photo, better quality images illustrating the topic already exist on Commons. Wikignome0530 (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept, no reason for deletion. If the author wants it deleted, he can nominate it. Kameraad Pjotr 18:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Renomination
uploaded without permission. Photo author wants deletion of original photo Joshb (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - you uploaded it, and stated you were the author... -mattbuck (Talk) 02:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I for once am willing to intertain the notion that the person in question doesn't speak english very well, and actually means that it's the person depicted who wants the image deleted and not the author. But i'm a bit split here, i don't see the image as something identifiable, but i wish to know more info so that we don't accidentally hurt somebody. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 14:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The original uploader wrote please delete the original photo on 11 December 2011. I respect the uploader's will. Moreover, it's useless image. Takabeg (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted - last DR was closed as Kept, no reason for deletion. If the author wants it deleted, he can nominate it. The author has asked us to delete it, so it shall be done. -mattbuck (Talk) 03:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
