Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo PSOE, 1976-2001.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Duplicate file of a previously deleted image (File:Logo_PSOE_1976-2001.svg) Sfs90 (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Keep because derivative files were kept as TOO compliant here and here. --Fer1997 (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- The files that are presenting Fer1997 doesn't have any relation, since the file nominated for deletion in this case is the exact duplicate of a previously deleted one. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Of course they have a relation because they are exactly the same logo, derived from the Albanian Socialist Party logo, with added features. What's more, when presenting arguments for deletion, there was a lot of emphasis put in the derivative nature of all logos which were presented as unfree. And the rose has been accepted as compliant with TOO so it's mostly settled. --Fer1997 (talk) 23:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, the reason for the deletion of the previous file are well explained on that deletion request. It's not allowed in Commons to re-upload previously deleted files, so this is the case. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Of course they have a relation because they are exactly the same logo, derived from the Albanian Socialist Party logo, with added features. What's more, when presenting arguments for deletion, there was a lot of emphasis put in the derivative nature of all logos which were presented as unfree. And the rose has been accepted as compliant with TOO so it's mostly settled. --Fer1997 (talk) 23:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- The files that are presenting Fer1997 doesn't have any relation, since the file nominated for deletion in this case is the exact duplicate of a previously deleted one. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The file is fine. Stop nominating these for deletion please. --Majora (talk) 02:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
