This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
1) In this photo geotagging is missing. 2) In this photo there are no objects that characterize a certain area. 3) Decorative straw rolls is not work of the contemporary art. — cheloVechek / talk01:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Chelovechek: It has no geotag because you just removed it. Really nice attempt to prevent deletion of a copyright infringement.
@IP: Sth. that is the main subject of the photograph ("les sculptures...") definitely cannot be DM. Also, sculptures are eligible for copyright, regardless of what stuff they are made of. --A.Savin07:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1) About "les sculptures...": оne little girl (my wife as a child, really fact) was abandoned unattended and she made figures from... feces. Рardon. Her parents called this "les sculptures", but "Hard words break no bones" (English Idiom). 2) The long way (4500 km) was through Moldova, Ukraine, Belarus and Russia by the car this summer. Everywhere were the same tradition of embellishment, so remember the exact place without geotag impossible. — cheloVechek / talk10:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] P.S. Аnalogously: no Panorama Freedom in France, but see Category:Straw bales in France. — cheloVechek / talk10:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Again, we have here 1) this photo of an installment which is creative enough to be above the originality threshold, and 2) the fact that this photo was taken in Belarus which does not have FoP (even though you have vandalized your own file by deleting the geotag and a correct category). --A.Savin11:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1) This is your subjective opinion, 2) You are mistaken about what is a geotag. This information should be based on EXIF solely. You accuse me of the vandalism in vain. This error correction, it is not vandalism. — cheloVechek / talk13:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Clearly taken in Belarus, where there is no FOP. User:Chelovechek's attempt to mislead us as to the location of the image is a serious violation of trust. If he does anything similar in the future, he shuold be blocked. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sommes-nous sérieux ? Il s'agit d'un amoncellement de ballots de paille, installé par un paysan. Les détails de la bouche sont marqués avec un spray de peinture. Si l'on considère cet homme de paille comme une œuvre d'art, il faudra supprimer tous les bonshommes de neige.
We are serious? It is about a pile of straw bundles, installed by a farmer. The details of the mouth are marked with a spray of paint. If we consider this man of straw as a work of art, it will be necessary to delete all the snowmen.
Sind wir ernst ? Es handelt sich um eine Anhäufung von Strohpacken, die von einem Bauern untergebracht ist. Die Einzelteile des Mundes sind mit Farbspray gekennzeichnet. Wenn man diesen Strohmann als ein Kunstwerk betrachtet, wird man alle Schneemänner beseitigen müssen.
Somos serios ? Se trata de un amontonamiento de bultos de paja, instalado por un campesino. Los detalles de la boca son marcados con un pulverizador de pintura. Si se considera a este hombre de paja una obra de arte, habrá que suprimir todos los muñecos de nieve. --François GOGLINS (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]
