Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laufendes-Auge.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyrighted in the US. No rule of shorter term. Kragenfaultier (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Keep The file was undeleted per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2009-08#The German "Walking Eye". This does not have anything to do with duration of copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept. ACK. Polarlys (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not PD in the US. The US copyright does not require more originality for applied arts. 89.0.176.87 07:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, see above. It was never copyrighted in the first place, so "shorter term" does not apply (if I understand the rationale correctly) --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- There isn't and was never since XIX. century the rule of shorter term in US copyright for work by Germans. Kragenfaultier (talk) 09:24, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Croton Dam Muskegon River Dscn1100 cropped.jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept, does not meet the threshold of originality, nor in Germany, nor in the US. Kameraad Pjotr 19:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
