Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kurböhmen-Erz.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake coat of arms invented by author has no support in history, the author replaces better ones by it Dragovit (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

miserable poor-quality picture with historical inaccuracies, a better vector version already exists Dragovit (talk) 23:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RM vandalism by user:Dragovit, note the Wikihounding and Personal Attacks. Categories are necessary for Wikis to function, stripping them is Vandalism. User makes no substantive contributions, but spends all their time attacking and Wikihounding the community and vandalizing random pages. Request permanent ban for Dragovit. Q douglasii (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop removing your discussion page with our conversation, that's tricky and deceptive behavior, you've done much damage to Wikipedia and Wikimedia by overhelming by inaccurate and ugly pictures and by starting editing wars. Replacing accurate files by your inaccurate and fictional ones is vandalization of Wikipedia. It is so indecent, selfish, mean and superior to replace the various files created by the members of community by own failed/amateur creations. – Dragovit (talk) 10:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: This file is in use on en:Prince-elector, so under COM:NPOV and COM:INUSE, it should not be deleted merely for being inaccurate or of poor quality. The question of which picture to use on en:Prince-elector should be dealt with on English Wikipedia, not here on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 14:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tha author of this file replaced another one on en:Prince-elector, which explains everything. The author inserted his files into the article without discussion. I see no reason why he can replace foreign files without discuss and no one else can replace his files by same way. – Dragovit (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTUSED. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 02:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]