Commons:Deletion requests/File:Korean Vulva3.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Korean_Vulva3.jpg

obscene 58.121.170.104 20:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

obscene --91.47.118.106 10:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Keep These are not deletion reasons. Please stop vandalizing Commons with them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - Wikimedia is not censored. There's a whole bunch of vulva images here, and I don't think we plan to delete all of them. ZooFari 16:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

---

Kept Infrogmation (talk) 03:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Korean_Vulva3.jpg

Unused. Better pictures exist. Oneiros (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

 Keep - was kept before Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

That doesn't change the fact that it's redundant and unused.--Oneiros (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

 Keep will the morality crusade please go away? Do we really need multiple DRs? It's not redundant; for some bizarre reason, the users of Commons are fixated on the one species found in the picture and find it useful to dwell on even minor differences extensively.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

At least it's unused. How many unused pictures do you want to keep?--Oneiros (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Out of the millions of unused pictures we have? If we're going to go on a rampage against unused pictures, I think we should kill a few pictures of buildings and trees while we're at it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

 Comment We are starting to have quite few views of women's genitals. It isn't censorship if we start to delete those that are both unused and of poorer quality. --Simonxag (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

 Delete too vulgar 91.48.62.81 07:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Not a deletion reason.--Prosfilaes (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Unused, and better quality images exist. ++Lar: t/c 11:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)