Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kirmit the frog (6549491809).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kirmit the frog (6549491809).jpg

Kermit is a creative/artistic design (unlike a celebrity person), no evidence flickr photographer has permission from Henson/Disney to release as CC (nor to cut'n'paste this professional/promotional movie capsule). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kermit the Frog on a Log.jpg. DMacks (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

For this one and at least one other file, we should try to work out if FOP in Australia, in regards to 'temporary' means photographing kermit at the airport in luggage claims, which would be transitory and temporary and so on, and whether it is ok to photograph him at his organised public appearance. Should on display other than temporary mean at his public appearance, or should it only be applied to something like if he was transformed into a bronze statue in a park, which doesn't really describe him as an animated little green character... we need research on similar cases/rulings in Australian courts! Penyulap ☏ 05:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kirmit the frog (6549489945).jpg is a near-dup of this one (and likely one of the ones Penyulap has in mind), so I'm adding it to the nom. DMacks (talk) 06:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

excellent work. I was actually thinking of a different subject than kermit, but keeping the files grouped is great. We still need some research about FOP and 'temporary' Penyulap ☏ 06:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kermit (6549538139).jpg also. DMacks (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

 Delete, sorry, but images seem to be copyviolating derivatives per COM:CB. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment We do need to look at Australian FOP law here, because temporary often means whilst works are in transit from say Point A to Point B. Would this meet the definition of "temporary" in this instance? russavia (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

These pictures appear to have Kermit not permanently installed, but instead intended as a limited-time viewing (interview or some other public exhibition). That would make it "temporary" and therefore not subject to {{FoP-Australia}}. DMacks (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

---

Deleted: "Permanent" does not mean "forever" -- witness ice or sand sculpture, and other similar things, but it does mean that it must have been installed with the intention of leaving it in the one place for the anticipated life of the object. That is clearly not the case here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)