Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean de Labadie by Emil Puls.jpg
With File:Labadie by Hieronymus Sweerts ca. 1640.jpg there is now a much better reproduction available, taken from the original engraving (that Emil Puls just photographed) naming the museum where it is kept and the original author Vsop.de (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thats not a reason for deletion. --Botaurus (talk) 02:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Where would one ever use a reproduction in low resolution of a blurred photograph with the misleading title "Labadie by Puls" and an (almost) unreadable inscription, when there is a high quality repro with details where it comes from? --Vsop.de (talk) 21:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Then one would have to delete half of Commons. For your purpose quite a {{duplicate}}-tool and not as an unfriendly request of deletion. --Botaurus (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Info, dass Commons zur Hälfte aus überflüssigen Dateien besteht, was aber kein Löschungsgrund sein soll, und für die Selbstdarstellung als beleidigte Leberwurst, für die es keinen Anlass gibt: "proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution". --Vsop.de (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not the same WB, and quality is almost never a reason for deletion PierreSelim (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
