Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 1.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 10.jpg similar to,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 11.jpg also similar to,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 12.jpg redundant to,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 13.jpg the same low quality,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 14.jpg the very same,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 15.jpg the same as the previous images,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 16.jpg no real difference to the previous photos,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 17.jpg the very same,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 18.jpg finally she stood up,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 7.jpg she sits down again,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 8.jpg and does, what shes been doing in the other photos,
File:Jasmine Byrne at set Not The Bradys XXX 9.jpg just like in this photo.
Custodial Reasons. 62.178.132.15 18:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not in use is not a reason to delete a file. Gohe007 (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Speedily closing this DR as the reason for it is invalid. The purpose of Commons is to act as a media file repository - that means some images may not be immediately usable. Tabercil (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have to open this Request again. The Pictures are quite bad (colour shadows, low resoultion) and they do not seem to have any educational purpose especially not if there are 12 nearly similar pictures of the same image. --Liberaler Humanist (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nice to see you Liberaler Humanist! The pictures are not good, yes, but a series is a nice thing and we usually keep also not good pictures. Especially for you I inserted them in Jasmine Byrne. If you would stop nominating everything which shows more naked skin then a average German shows in the winter I could donate my time also to other topics ... Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 13:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The DR is not linked from the file's pages and is therefore invalid. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Saibo. Anatiomaros (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yep - you said it already: To show the person. An additional use is to show a series of photos with different positions in general. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Quality is acceptable. Images are usable. No reason to delete. Common Good (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]