Commons:Deletion requests/File:Idf soldier treated.png
The flickr "source" says: from The Economist facebook fan page . Not validly licensed under cc-by-sa. Martin H. (talk) 00:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- The Flickr page also lists the date of upload as the date the photograph was taken, but that doesn't mean that the photograph was taken on that date. Likewise, the Flickr page does not anywhere list The Economist facebook fan page as the "source", it says that the image was retrieved from there. Please also note that this very same photograph appeared on numerous high-profile international news networks all around the world, along with other images from the same camera. If you have an objection to the license or source of the image, you should report it to Flickr first. --386-DX (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Just klick to the next image in that flickr accounts photostream, http://www.flickr.com/photos/freegaza/4678053655/in/set-72157624098328099/, there is a sourcelink, http://www.internethaber.com/israilden-kacirilan-fotograflar-foto-galerisi-7784-p1.htm and that image is indeed also on that source (this photo is there too). The wording "From the economists... does clearly indicate that this photo is taken from somewhere and is not own work as all images on that photostream are not own work, see two image later the big watermark at http://www.flickr.com/photos/freegaza/4678033571/in/set-72157624098328099/. That is a wrong licensed, missleading photostream and a bad flickr user. And no, I dont care about Flickr, Im not authorized to report copyright violations to Flickr.com as only the copyright holder can do that. But I can care about the reuse here on Commons and prevent reuse of non-free content here under false licenses with attribution to wrong authorship/copyright claimants. --Martin H. (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- We do not know who is the author of this photo, and we did not receive her explicit permission to release its cropped version under a free license. Hence this photo should be speedy-deleted.
- The real author of this work could release it later under a free license, if so she wishes, and we could use the OTRS system to get her word for it. 79.183.13.133 06:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Myself. Because I now saw the original upload log saying: {{Non-free use rationale | Description = Activists aboard Mavi Marmara treating the IDF soldier | Source = Taken from a photo gallery in Internet Haber website | Article = [http://www.internethaber.com/israilden-kacirilan-fotograflar-foto-galerisi-7784-p2.htm İsrail'den kaçırılan fotoğraflar!][...] Well, thats exactly the source I say its from - the photo was flickrwashed, maybe by accident because someone realy thought that someone else uploading to flickr will change the copyright status to free or maybe intentionally because someone created a fake account on flickr. The photo is not free and "non-free use" isnt accepted on Commons in any case. --Martin H. (talk) 10:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to explain. --386-DX (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
