Commons:Deletion requests/File:ITV +1.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This logo is licened as a English logo according to the tagg. As you can read here the treshold of originality is lower in the UK than in the states so I want a second opinion on this one. I doubt the simple geometry because of the different colors and the letters do not have the same thicknes. Because of the colors you get more complicated forms then arcs and basic geometrical figures. Natuur12 (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- As a comparassis: this the forms of this logo ar similar but it is still protected according the English law. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep The other ITV logos are here including the master one. Fry1989 eh? 20:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 07:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is a UK logo. UK has low COM:TOO. The choice of colours in the special font would more than meet that TOO 106.68.109.97 10:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete above to per my previous rational. The previous closing seems to be based on a other stuff excist argument which can hardly be called a valid argument. Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy close per WP:DENY (or local equivalent being hammered out at COM:ANUP) (Nomination by sock of Russavia) Andy Dingley (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: meets the threshold of originality in the European Union (and therefore in the United Kingdom). The author was, to quote the Court of Justice, "able to express his creative abilities in the production of the work by making free and creative choices". This is shown – in my opinion – in the combination of an original, handwriting-like typeface and an original colour scheme. Woodcutterty (talk) 18:36, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Andy Dingley and previous DR result. Fry1989 eh? 20:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kept, per precedent (previous DRs for this and similar logos) and bad-faith nomination. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
