Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hustler Booth AVN 2010.jpg
Derivative work. Needs permission. Sdrtirs (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -Pete F (talk) 05:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: those posters are de minimis here. Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
About 20% of this photo contains copyright material that is clearly visible including several posters and the Hustler Video logo. It doesn't matter if individually they are de minimis, because collectively they form a significant chunk of the photo. The previous nomination was not closed properly because none of the opinions were against deletion other than the closing admin. User:Rosenzweig should have given an opinion and left deletion to another admin. I've tried cropping the photo but my old friend User:Tm decided to reverse the crop as an unofficial admin and guardian against me. FredWalsh (talk) 00:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep I´am not an "an unofficial admin and guardian against" said user, i only reverted the original version of this file from being speed deleted with a rationale that was against a previous deletion request closed as De Minimis. Said user even tried to bypass the decision to keep an image that he himself nominated to deletion in 2105
If said user feels bad about the facts, mainly getting reverted for making this same actions in several files, always with the same modus operandi: 1 - This user cropped the originalimage 2 - Tried to get the original version speedy deleted as a derivative work. But reverted he got, on several, as per previous deletion requests the copyrighted materials were and are De Minimis. Of particular interest is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parisdahl-avn2006.jpg were he tried to bypass a previous decision on an image nominated by him in 2015. So what is he whining about?Tm (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @FredWalsh: Why exactly should I only "have given an opinion" and then "left deletion to another admin"? And why do you write "left deletion" and not "left the decision", as if if was already decided that deletion is the outcome of this request? --Rosenzweig τ 13:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I guess I get it now, you seem to think admins are only allowed to agree with opinions voiced by someone in the discussion, but not to make a decision independent of that? That would be absurd IMO. --Rosenzweig τ 13:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: It's clear to me that the major focus of the image was the copyright posters and covers at the bottom and right side. Fred's crop eliminates that problem, leaving an image that is much less useful, but free of copyvio. Note that the fact that the remaining image is much less useful is proof that the copyrighted material was not de minimis. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
