Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human brain frontal (coronal) section.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this image would be CC-BY. The source site states: "©1993 – 2013 THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH • SPENCER S. ECCLES HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY". Eleassar (t/p) 07:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following images:
--Eleassar (t/p) 07:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep (Only brief information about these files) Once I confirmed that these images were released under Wikimedia Commons compatible CC license, because I needed to check its license status clearly, for using some of these images as basic images in some navigation templates (for example Template:Human brain midsagittal cut, ja:Template:大脳回, ja:Template:脳矢状断). When I checked, these image were distributed in PPT (PowerPoint) file format (I made variant images from original PPT file). And, in file description page in the website (file download page was http://www.healcentral.org/healapp/showMetadata?metadataId=40566 . But this URL is currently redirected to top page of the website), it was clearly declared that this file is released under CC compatible license. --Was a bee (talk) 08:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Usage Rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ [1]--Sporti (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for having provided the link. This means a lot of images have been saved.  I withdraw my nomination. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded these images 7 years ago. Unfortunately the original PowerPoint presentation isn't available anymore under this link. How can we avoid such problems in future? Obviously webpages/links can change or die and then the source information including the copyright information is lost. --Patho (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)--Patho (talk) 15:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. In the future, problems such as this can be avoided by using the {{LicenseReview}} template, which will ensure that a third party admin confirms the license on the external website. Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]