Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human Anal.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Very likely a crop of copyrighed commercial content, as evidenced by the pattern of contributions by this uploader. ˉanetode╦╩ 08:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- What makes you think that? Same can go for other pictures. A better base for deletion is needed. dnm (t | c) 18:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- On the contrary, a better account of the subject's permission, authorship (or source) and licensing verification is needed for Wikimedia to accept this contribution. I'm surprised it lasted as long as it has for an obvious copyvio. ˉanetode╦╩ 11:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well i do not agree, however I am not that active on commons. For most part i edit the Swedish Wikipedia. Maybe you can help me whit finding a good replacement for this picture here on commons, if this picture is to be deleted? Regards, dnm (t | c) 23:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- On the contrary, a better account of the subject's permission, authorship (or source) and licensing verification is needed for Wikimedia to accept this contribution. I'm surprised it lasted as long as it has for an obvious copyvio. ˉanetode╦╩ 11:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree with anetode╦╩. This image is of questionable origin, and is only 400px wide. It should go. User:ojibberish
- I can imagine you do, edit waring in the article about the human anus. dnm (t | c) 23:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why I'm being accused of edit warring. I am trying to preserve the image that has accompanied the article since 2007. Your revision is the new one. And, your revision degrades the article with a substandard image of questionable origin. The accepted form of the entry should be restored. You should stop warring over your petition to change it. This image should be deleted. No case has been made for legitimate use. The size is too small to be of utility, and we have high quality and appropriate images available in its place. -Ojibberish
- You are beeing accused of edit warring because you are edit warring. You have been reverted by 4 different users in recent time, still you are basically insisting that it's your way or the highway. You should be more humble to that and do use the discussion page if you want to try to get a consensus that is more to your taste. We've told you several times that a vagina is not a human anus. I dont know about the rules on english Wikipedia, but I am sure that edit warring could lead to the blocking of an account. dnm (t | c) 22:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why I'm being accused of edit warring. I am trying to preserve the image that has accompanied the article since 2007. Your revision is the new one. And, your revision degrades the article with a substandard image of questionable origin. The accepted form of the entry should be restored. You should stop warring over your petition to change it. This image should be deleted. No case has been made for legitimate use. The size is too small to be of utility, and we have high quality and appropriate images available in its place. -Ojibberish
Deleted: Nuking all uploaders images. Blocked indefinitely. COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 17:53, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
