Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heita Kawakatsu 20141113.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Copyright violation
TKsdik8900 (uploader) says "Source=https://www.env.go.jp/park/minamialps/5_miraihe.pdf". However, his explanation was false. TKsdik8900 uploaded this photo on 05:29, November 13, 2023. This photo does not come from 5_miraihe.pdf. This photo came from the website of the Foreign Press Center Japan. This website says "Copyright © 2015- Foreign Press Center Japan. All Rights Reserved". Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
.jp){kind=link}
- Derived file(s) additionally nominated: File:Heita Kawakatsu 20141113 (cropped).jpg whym (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete This photo does not exist in 5_miraihe.pdf. TKsdik8900's explanation was false. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep I would like to illustrate my point about this problem. I have several cases I uploaded files: File:Tarō Asō 20170920.jpg, File:Hideaki Ōmura 20180607.jpg and File:Mana Ashida 2020.jpg, for instance. These three files were overwritten with higher resolution versions by me, which were reviewed by each image reviewers. We can also find File:Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko with the Imperial Family (November 2013).jpg and File:Fumio Kishida 20211005.jpg, which were overwritten by other users and reviewed by image reviewers. The sources of reviewed files above were still the original versions' URL. As you can see from these precedents, the quality or resolution of the files does not matter, but whether it is the same file does. Essentially, we can overwrite files for replacement with higher resolution versions of the same files, according to Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO overwrite. If you think that such files constitute copyright infringement, I suggest that you contact the reviewers and discuss your thought. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment That is not a reason to disguise the source. And it's not a reason to misrepresent the license.
- The photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 did not change the resolution of the image subject to the Terms of Use for Using the Content of the Ministry of the Environment's website (Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use Ver.2.0). The photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 has a larger shooting range than the image subject to GJSTU-2.0, so there is no way to make derivative works of the image subject to GJSTU-2.0. There is no problem to make derivative works of the image subject to GJSTU-2.0. But the photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 was reprocessed from the another website. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 02:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I understood your claim. This disagreement is not likely to be resolved by talking on this page, so let's discuss this once on your talk page. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 05:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- After discussions with Nnkrkrhhdi, I found that he and I have fundamentally different perceptions about licensing. I would expect, as have been the cases above in the past, a consistent decision by an administrator as Commons, even if I do not know which administrator will make it, but if a decision is made that differs from previous precedents, I will respect it and take it into consideration. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Info TKsdik8900 (uploader) said "当該画像を官公庁ホームページ以外のウェブサイトから入手した" on 05:35, December 28, 2023. TKsdik8900 confessed that TKsdik8900 disguised the source. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It's an old photo that Shizuoka prefecture (2015) used. It seems likely that the prefecture, one this person is the governor of, is the original author of the picture, and the one who can license it (so the central government including the environment ministry is not in the position to license it). Shizuoka's copyright policy available on their website is "All Rights Reserved", and I don't see specific license about this picture either. An unlikely situation where copyright transfer (to the central government, or to FPCJ) happened is not impossible, but we would certainly need specific evidence for that. Without further evidence, I would say the first possibility I gave above is most likely - that means that the work is not licensed by the copyright holder. whym (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: mostly per whym - likely to be from Shizuoka Prefecture, which does not grant the GJSTU. --Yasu (talk) 15:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
.jp){kind=link}
