Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harikalar Diyari Smurfs 06048 nevit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
- File:Harikalar Diyari Smarfs gargamel 06047 nevit.jpg
- File:Harikalar Diyari Smurfs gargamel 06050 nevit.jpg
- File:Harikalar Diyari Smurfs 06048 nevit.jpg
Copyvio. The Smurfs was published in 1958. The article 40 of the Turkish copyright law (English text) is related with works settled on umumi yollar (public roads), caddeler (streets) ve meydanlar (squares). However Harikalar Diyarı is neither public road, nor street, square. It's an amusement park. Takabeg (talk) 12:22, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep FOP. 2D reproduction of 3D objects. Already closed DR is being reopened at multiple locations! Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barney Rubble Harikalar Diyari Flintstones 06019 nevit.jpg I suggest all DR's to be merged. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment Already closed DR's here Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Harikalar_Diyari_Smurfs_gargamel_06050_nevit.jpg and here Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Harikalar Diyari Smurfs 06048 nevit.jpg --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment In Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Harikalar_Diyari_Smurfs_gargamel_06050_nevit.jpg and here Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Harikalar Diyari Smurfs 06048 nevit.jpg, users misread and misunderstood articles of law. There is no legal basis for us to make them free content. Takabeg (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The FoP law is plain as day. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 17:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Please read Commons talk:Freedom of panorama#Turkey. The Turkish copyright law doesn't permit for all works of fine art permanently displayed outdoors. It permit for all works of fine art permanently displayed on public streets, (public) avenues or (public) squares. Takabeg (talk) 17:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Copy of a comment given in a related DR. I wonder if this theme park wouldn't qualify as a public street. In Belgium, the new Région Wallonne's Forest code considers private paths openly accessible to public, without any indication it's private by a sign or a barrier, as public paths for the code application. Doing so, the legislator put in the law a doctrine analysis. Similarly, the road code is applicable to any private property (like a supermarket parking) where anybody can access without a barrier. Could you make some inquiries on how Turkey law, jurisprudence and doctrine treat the private estate openly accessible by all? --Dereckson (talk) 19:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Added here --Dereckson (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As in similar DR about FOP in Turkey Cambalachero (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
