Commons:Deletion requests/File:Han Qide 2011.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It's a picture from the official photostream of w:Saeima, we have a lot pictures from this photostream. It seems that the license on the flickr image page contradicts to the license claims in the flickr profile. Trycatch (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- It seems like Saeima creators are not understand the rules of the Creative Commons licensing. Or they did not updated profile after they began (June, 2010) to use free licensing. Is it a problem? --Gaujmalnieks (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- I believe it's a problem. Generally we delete pictures with contradicting license claims. It's possible that they have simply forgot to update the profile, but honestly it's quite unlikely. Trycatch (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose to "we have a lot of pictures" part. Saeima had part of its images licensed under licence compatible with commons licensing. The CC licence is not revokable, even if they now have changed licencing ~~Xil (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- CC licenses are irrevocable, but we don't know if the pictures were properly released in the first place. It's quite possible that the CC tag was placed by some employee of the organization (e.g. a person instructed to upload pictures to flickr and maintain the flickr photostream), who didn't have the right to release the pictures under a CC license. Trycatch (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- There is no indication of that and the same could be said about any pictures released under such licence. I doubt there is any law requiring republisher to guess what original publisher was thinking ~~Xil (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- There is a very good indication of that -- detailed version of the license (written in legalese) from the flickr profile contradicts to CC-BY. Moreover, the very same license is presented on the official site of Saeima: http://www.saeima.lv/lv/autortiesibas, but there is no sign on their site that they have released their works under a Creative Commons license. So it's quite likely that the CC-BY-SA tag on Flickr was just a somebody's mistake. "I doubt there is any law requiring republisher to guess what original publisher was thinking " -- well, if a republished uses content without a permission from the holder of copyright, it is an infringer. Trycatch (talk) 01:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- There is no indication of that and the same could be said about any pictures released under such licence. I doubt there is any law requiring republisher to guess what original publisher was thinking ~~Xil (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- CC licenses are irrevocable, but we don't know if the pictures were properly released in the first place. It's quite possible that the CC tag was placed by some employee of the organization (e.g. a person instructed to upload pictures to flickr and maintain the flickr photostream), who didn't have the right to release the pictures under a CC license. Trycatch (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
